V2 is capable of a robust 20 km link when used with 19 dBi antennas, without exceeding the ACMA power limits in Australia.
Both surveys were done with a 12 dBi panel antenna on a stand pointed out a window. The only change was swapping the UltraWAP V1 for an UltraWAP V2. As you can see - many more APs were seen on the survey.
Click here to see our detailed receiver sensitivity and speed graphs ...
Ever since the Minitar MNWAPB went out of production, Freenet Antennas searched for an alternative with the same great combination of performance and value. Not surprisingly - we found the answer at the same factory that made the original Minitar MNWAPB.
Customer Comments
Login: admin Password: 1234 URL: [ Click Here ]
See this page for full details of the performance testing.
I used to use a Minitar MNWAPB for my setup with 6 clients but noticed a severe problem when we deployed video streaming. Clients dropped off when more than 1 person watched it. With Minitar MNWAPB AP: PC1 starts a download from the router at 620KB/s PC2 tries to download the same file and gets around 30KB/s PC3 tries to download the same file and gets around 10KB/s With UltraWAP AP: PC1 starts a download from the router at 620KB/s PC2 tries to download the same file and gets around 310KB/s and PC1 goes down to 310KB/s PC3 tries to download the same file and gets around 210KB/s, as do PC1 and PC2. In simple terms this seems to be load sharing over clients which has dramatically improved the general use for everyone.
With Minitar MNWAPB AP: PC1 starts a download from the router at 620KB/s PC2 tries to download the same file and gets around 30KB/s PC3 tries to download the same file and gets around 10KB/s
With UltraWAP AP: PC1 starts a download from the router at 620KB/s PC2 tries to download the same file and gets around 310KB/s and PC1 goes down to 310KB/s PC3 tries to download the same file and gets around 210KB/s, as do PC1 and PC2.
In simple terms this seems to be load sharing over clients which has dramatically improved the general use for everyone.
Note: This customer used 802.11b (11 Mbps) clients in this test. If he had used 802.11g (54 Mbps) clients, overall speeds would have been faster in the test with the UltraWAP AP.